Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. However, keep in mind that too much use of the first person can actually distract the reader from the main points [i. First, because the participants were highly experienced IM users, they may frequently converse with more than one person while performing a concurrent task.
A related sequence of actions can be combined into one sentence to improve clarity and readability: Several preliminary studies conducted in the past several years suggest that exposure-based therapy can be used in individuals with cooccurring SUDs and PTSD as long as careful attention is paid to substance use.
Although your study may offer important insights about the research problem, this is where you can address other questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or highlight previously hidden questions that were revealed as a result of conducting your research.
Your goal should be to critically analyze and interpret the findings of your study. Our scientific writing workshops consistently receive high praise from participants including graduate students, post-docs, and faculty in diverse fields. One of them is to allocate at least 30 minutes a day for writing a manuscript which amounts to 3.
Secondly, syutax, and grammar of the manuscript should be controlled. What was your overall approach for studying the gap? The Practice of Nursing Research: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid.
Avoiding the "school paper style" rejection. If these additional findings relate to your main finding, discuss the associations. Bates College; Hess, Dean R. In the current sample, telehealth PE treatment was safe and pragmatically viable.
During writing process of the manuscript one of these can be selected based on the intensity of the discussion. In conclusion, whoever the preferred referee will be, these internal, and external referees should respond the following questions objectively.
Daily working requirements unrelated to the manuscript writing might intervene, and prolong manuscript writing process. Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this information. These data are all the more encouraging in light of extant data, which suggests that attitudes toward mental health use are positively associated with actual service use e.
Structure and Writing Style These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: Discuss potential limitations in study design.
Achievement of the shared duties within a predetermined time frame will sustain the motivation of the researchers, and prevent wearing out of updated data.
Besides the target journal to be selected should be ready to accept articles with similar concept. University of Toronto; Sauaia, A. Recommendations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections.
How should the intermediate paragraphs of the Discussion section be formulated?
Do they affect the ability to generalize your findings? Someone else should be able to go to the exact location of your study site if they want to repeat or check your work, or just visit your study area.
Indeed young colleagues have the enthusiasm, and energy required for the conduction of the study, while middle-aged researchers have the knowledge to manage the research, and manuscript writing. Treatment noncompletion rates, although higher than average for our clinic, were in the acceptable range.
Evaluating the medical literature Part I: The nuts and bolts of publishing your research. Summarize the major gap in understanding that your work is attempting to fill.
The function of the Results section is to objectively present your key resultswithout interpretation, in an orderly and logical sequence using both text and illustrative materials Tables and Figures.
Of course you did, because that is what all good scientists do, and it is a given that you recorded your measurements and observations.
The first rule that applies to writing your discussion is therefore to allow enough time to give it the credit that it deserve. Provide one or two recommendations for future research or follow-up studies. Are the results of statistical analysis presented?How to write the results and discussion.
Michael P. Dosch CRNA MS June Results. Be happy! You’re getting there. Just a small amount of writing. Feb 12, · The discussion section can be written in 3 parts: an introductory paragraph, intermediate paragraphs and a conclusion paragraph.
For intermediate paragraphs, a “divide and conquer” approach, meaning a full paragraph describing each of the study endpoints, can be used.
Strategy for writing the Methods section. 4. Methods FAQs. Top of Page The Discussion will always connect to the Introduction by way of the question(s) or hypotheses you posed and the literature you cited, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the Introduction.
Instead, it tells how your study has moved us forward from. Writing the Discussion. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by.
Feb 12, · Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician. The aim of the present review is to outline the main aspects of writing the discussion section of a manuscript.Download